FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION
For over 20 years, the U.S. Freedom of Navigation program has ensured that excessive coastal state claims over the world’s oceans and airspace are challenged. By State Department diplomatic protests and operational assertions conducted by the Department of Defense, the U.S. has insisted upon adherence by the nations of the world to the international law of the sea. A significant majority of countries (145, as of May 2004) are now Parties to the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, and there is an encouraging trend toward the rolling-back of excessive maritime claims. Nonetheless, some coastal states continue to assert maritime claims inconsistent with international law, which, if left unchallenged, would limit navigational freedoms vital to U.S. national security and essential to peaceful uses of the world’s oceans.
From FY 2000 through FY 2003,[1] U.S. armed forces conducted operational assertions challenging excessive maritime claims as listed below.
In addition, air and surface units transited the Indonesian Archipelago (in archipelagic sea lanes passage) and the Philippine Archipelago (by exercising high seas freedoms, transit passage and innocent passage rights, as applicable) on numerous occasions. Military vessels and aircraft also frequently conduct routine transits through international straits, such as the Straits of Gibraltar, Hormuz, and Malacca. Combined with robust and highly visible routine operations by U.S. forces on, over, and under the world’s oceans, and U.S. support for the navigational provisions of the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, Freedom of Navigation Operations have continued to underscore the U.S. commitment to a stable legal regime for the world’s oceans.
Considering the importance of global stability and U.S. national security in light of the events of September 11, 2001, State Department and the U.S. armed forces will continue to assert U.S. navigation and overflight rights.
Note: * designates countries where FON operations have been conducted more than
once during FY 2000 – 2003
Country Excessive Maritime Claim Challenged
Albania Prior authorization for warships to enter
territorial sea
Algeria Prior authorization for warships to enter
territorial sea
Bangladesh* Excessive straight baselines
Burma* 24 nautical mile (nm) security zone;
Excessive straight baselines;
Authority to regulate over-flight in
international space.
Cambodia* Excessive straight baselines;
24 nm security zone
Croatia Prior authorization for warships to enter
territorial sea
Ecuador 200 nm territorial sea
Egypt* Prior notice for warships/nuclear powered
vessels to enter territorial sea/Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ)
El Salvador 200 nm territorial sea
India 24 nm security zone; prior
authorization for warships to enter
territorial sea
Indonesia* Prior notification for warships to enter
territorial sea
Libya Claimed historical waters status (i.e.,
internal waters status) for Gulf of
Sidra
Malaysia* Prior authorization to conduct military
activities in EEZ
Maldives* Prior notification for warships to enter
territorial sea
Malta Prior authorization for warships to enter
territorial sea
Panama 200 nm territorial sea
Philippines* Excessive straight baselines;
Claims archipelagic waters as internal
Sri Lanka Security zone; prior permission for
warships to enter territorial sea
Syria* 35 nm territorial sea; prior permission for warships to enter territorial sea
Taiwan Excessive straight baselines; 24 nm security
zone
Venezuela* Claimed security zone
Vietnam* Excessive straight baselines; prior
permission for warships to enter territorial sea
[1] Prior to FY 2000, reports for this program were published annually in the Department of Defense Annual Report to the President and Congress, and are available online.